Update
Oh now I wonder why Andrea is wanting to ingratiate herself with this man?
No I'm still not associated with Mo nor am I any of the sockpuppets SNORK
http://maxdunbar.wordpress.
That's all about her new pal Nero.
She does like to troll, doesn't she?
I see Sheryl has gone again... the conspiracy theories will be aired again LOL
Screenshots enlarge if clicked
Ha!
Previous blogs on this subject?
This one where I describe Ambrosine Shitrit's bizarre attempts to link me in with other Twitter accounts I am most certainly not:
http://nemesisrespondsto.
And a little on the many sockpuppets Mrs Shitrit has created (there have been others... eventually Twitter suspended most of them... though I think a couple still online... she loves me she loves me not?)
I can only laugh. Not too subtle really. This is a recent one, now suspended. She loves me...
And here's one she made much earlier:
Suspensions, by the way, usually come about as result of breaking Twitter rules. Multiple violations in some cases. And Ambrosine is still breaking Twitter rules https://twitter.com/rules by creating new accounts when her previous were suspended following abuse reports.
Not "malicious fake reports" as her multiple suspended pal Sheryl McNaught (now back with yet another) claims, but linked to tweets? Currently she's given up on the mass spam attack BS and is now alleging, without any proof of course, this is a conspiracy between a genuine anti-hate org and someone she claims they are friends with at Twitter HQ. That's for another blog.
Oh really? Had meetings with Twitter HQ have you? Doubtful.
Oh really? Had meetings with Twitter HQ have you? Doubtful.
Ambrosine, deluded as ever, is still trying to link me in with the Mo Ansar sock puppet allegations. Yes @TheMrsShitrit is suspended (made, against Twitter rules, when her @Mrs_Shitrit was suspended)
Still waiting for the proof of this one Ambrosine? (NB another new account.)
No I'm not Ann. I doubt Ann is Mo either.
But if Ambrosine Shitrit can smear me as antisemitic, well, why allow a small thing like truth to get in the way?
The story as tweeted by Ann Fields about a UKIP candidate's Holocaust views is here:
UKIP candidate claims Jews murdered each other in the Holocaust in masterplan to create State of Israel
A UKIP candidate has sparked outrage by reportedly claiming that Jews deliberately murdered each other in the Holocaust as part of a masterplan to create Israel.
The extreme views were posted in Mrs Anna-Marie Crampton’s name on a conspiracy theory website called ‘Secrets of The Fed’.
Crampton, 57, is allegedly quoted as saying: “Holocaust means a sacrifice by fire. Only the Zionists could sacrifice their own in the gas chambers.
“The Second World Wide War was engineered by the Zionist jews and financed by the banksters to make the general public all over the world to feel so guilty and outraged by the Holocaust that a treaty would be signed to create the State of Israel as we know it today.”
Mrs Crampton posed with UKIP leader Nigel Farrage at a rally in Tunbridge Wells, Kent, two weeks ago – and proudly posted a photo on her Facebook page.
There is more, the full story is at this link:
with no hint of outrage from Ambrosine Shitrit? Nothing? Not a peep? Just an attempt to deflect from the views of a UKIP candidate? Had anyone else said these things, Ambrosine would have been calling the outrage bus?
I wonder if the reason why Mrs Shitrit didn't pick up on the story about a UKIP candidate and her views on the Holocaust, who quotes The Protocols of Zion as a source, and attempted instead her usual unsophisticated tactic of deflection and accusation, is because Mrs Shitrit is a UKIP supporter?
Which is ironic really. But some immigrants are more equal than others?
And if you are going to start accusing people of antisemitism, then do try to learn some history first?
The two articles linked to by Ann Field to support what she said:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/
“Members of the Stern group are now being organised and are under training. It is expected that they will be sent to the United Kingdom to assassinate important members of his majesty’s government, particularly, Mr Bevin.”
In the months that followed a number of bombs exploded in London and an attempt was made to drop on a bomb on the House of Commons from a hired plane. This last effort was only stopped after French Police discovered Stern Gang members preparing to cross the channel in a plane containing a large bomb.
“Members of the Stern group are now being organised and are under training. It is expected that they will be sent to the United Kingdom to assassinate important members of his majesty’s government, particularly, Mr Bevin.”
In the months that followed a number of bombs exploded in London and an attempt was made to drop on a bomb on the House of Commons from a hired plane. This last effort was only stopped after French Police discovered Stern Gang members preparing to cross the channel in a plane containing a large bomb.
As World War II came to a close, MI5 received a stream of intelligence reports warning that the Irgun and the Stern Gangwere not just planning violence in the Mandate of Palestine, but were also plotting to launch attacks inside Britain....
....They stated that among the targets for assassination were Britain's foreign secretary, Ernest Bevin, who was regarded as the main obstacle to the establishment of a Jewish state in the Middle East, and the prime minister himself. MI5's new director-general, Sir Percy Sillitoe, was so alarmed that in August 1946 he personally briefed the prime minister on the situation, warning him that an assassination campaign in Britain had to be considered a real possibility, and that his own name was known to be on a Stern Gang hit list...
...The Irgun and the Stern Gang's wartime track record ensured that MI5 took these warnings seriously. In November 1944 the Stern Gang had assassinated the British minister for the Middle East, Lord Moyne, while he was returning to his rented villa after a luncheon engagement in Cairo...
Was there any discussion on those? No. Simply more mobbing and bullying.
As with this
What Mo Ansar said was NOT that Hitler was a Jew, was it? Whatever the ins and outs of the Mo Ansar affair, Mrs Shitrit's Yad account states he said Hitler was a Jew when that is not what he said.
"Do you think Hitler was a Jew? Mo Ansar does"
Still at it. Does she think Hitler is still alive too?
Still at it. Does she think Hitler is still alive too?
No what he said was he was PART JEWISH. Slight difference? Hitler was a monster whatever his background.
And nor did @Alixir13 make an antisemitic remark, which Ambrosine has claimed, by stating she was taught in school in GCE History Hitler had a Jewish background / was Jewish? What is antisemitic about stating what she was taught in school?
The controversy over that still carries on, with many articles and a great deal of research proving nothing very conclusive.
The internet is full of such.
Here's the Daily Fail in 2010:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/
And Mrs Shitrit's favourite the Torygraph:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/
Here's the Independent in 2014:
Make of all that what you will.
Twitter ... the school playground.
Love
Nem
xxx
No comments:
Post a Comment