Andrea Urban Fox: intimidation and faked tweets

Screenshots enlarge if clicked 

You take the piss? Really?  Hadn't noticed! Maybe your 'wit' is far too subtle then.  So subtle it doesn't actually exist?

So that's an admission then, that you are 'stalking' as you put it? Thanks for that! :0)

Yes I document your lies, for all manner of reasons!

http://nemesisrespondsto.blogspot.co.uk/2014/09/documenting-your-trolling-for-legal.html

Perhaps Tower Hamlets Police appreciate that you are happy to lie and intimidate others so they don't take you seriously? (How's that injunction coming on Andrea BTW? Wasting the time of Judge Sterlini at Clerkenwell & Shoreditch County Court?)

September 8th 2014.

Sounding sore and butthurt again there Andrea.

I mean, what's this on your blog if it isn't harassment and intimidation?

Isn't impersonating me on a website in order to be vile a form of harassment Andrea?

http://nemesisrespondsto.blogspot.co.uk/2014/07/andrea-toad-is-butthurt-and-trying-to.html

Isn't making a fake Facebook account of your son on Google + and Facebook, lying about me,  and encouraging your pals to harass me intimidation? Yes your sister Thais Matteoli duly obliged.

http://nemesisrespondsto.blogspot.co.uk/2014/09/trolls-socks-stalkers-harassment-again.html

Isn't publishing people's private information harassment and intimidation Andrea?  But it's OK when you do it to me, is it?

Er... rather thought it was you couldn't leave me alone, Andrea dear :0)!

All I've done is blog about your lies, harassment and bullshit Andrea. Problem with that have you?

Thought you claimed the vicar got an anonymous email? Well, not from me he didn't. Not from Alison Chabloz he didn't.

I haven't contacted your church Andrea. Not by email, not by phone, not in person. Gonna apologise for that lie? Or do I have to contact the Bishop of Stepney and point out your lies?

http://nemesisrespondsto.blogspot.co.uk/2014/08/new-found-religion-and-cyberbullies.html

Andrea was busy busy yesterday, still spreading her butthurt and lies to her troll pals.

https://storify.com/Alison_Chabloz/andrea-urban-fox-calls-the-police

Stalker? Laughable crap!  But you don't 'stalk' eh Andrea?  I see you tweeting to your poodles. I'm sure Alison was grateful for you tweeting out her Storify, which is a very interesting one, with you whining and then rubbishing  Met police, one of whom saved a life yesterday.  I've embedded it at the end of this blog.* Fascinating stuff!  You have the mentality of a child!

And yes we all know who posted a link to your son's school... you did Andrea.  Took videos inside the school, not only of your own child but of named others,  and posted all over the internet.  Sort of thing NSPCC warns against.

http://www.safenetwork.org.uk/help_and_advice/best_safeguarding_practice/Pages/photographing_children.aspx

One person made a screenshot of your tweet, with kids' faces blanked and no link whatsoever to the school, with a 'fair comment'.  As far as I am aware no-one has contacted your son's school either, certainly I haven't. However, there is no law to say they can't is there? It would depend on the reason and how they made contact.

Bullshitting again?  Sounds like it. Well, police haven't contacted me,  so I'll contact them, to put the record straight.

Were you getting a so called 'crime ref' again so you could lie to Twitter in order to get someone suspended again, as you did with me?

 Yes I contacted CID, who confirmed this is a lie.

And one person sent a tweet to a business on Twitter, which again didn't actually link to your son's school despite your lie it did.  Isn't that what Twitter is for, to make contact with people? Hardly 'contacting your real life friends' is it?

http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/sep/30/what-do-you-do-if-your-pictures-are-used-without-your-consent-on-social-networks

Ah yes... that would apply to Andrea, who used my photo on her blog and Twitter to make abusive comments, which were removed under a DCMA notice?  Here's one example, there are others:

Jealous? Of you Andrea? Deluded is all I can say dear :0) You're not exactly a stunnah are you?

That's Andrea bitching about Alison Chabloz, who she's  encouraging her troll pals to  er.... troll? Harass? Intimidate?

Golly... cut to the quick I am!

She even stole a photo of someone else from the internet as she thought it was me, in order to spew her bile.

http://nemesisrespondsto.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/andrea-urban-fox-gets-it-wrong-again.html

Never one to miss out on spreading bile, Andrea this morning tweeted this link to her tedious troll pal Holborn:

And what does that lead to?

A tweet faked using this prog:

I gather that's now in the hands of police. More on that here:

https://storify.com/Alison_Chabloz/andrea-urban-fox-beats-a-retreat

Andrea is no stranger to that prog, her pet stalker troll account (now suspended for harassment and abuse, mainly of me... there's a surprise) used to use it also, to fake tweets claimed from me.

Oh look, here's Andrea's pet troll,  the vile and now suspended @_NewsExtra (along with Andrea's troll account @GotaBoneToPick, suspended for harassing me):

And again:

And Andrea's pal suspended Sheryl McNaught of @YadbyadUK spread it despite knowing it was faked:

I have others, but you get the drift.

Andrea's troll account did the same to Ewok, whom Andrea doesn't like (she called him a paedo too, she's really a sad smearmonger is Andrea)

This always gets Andrea fuming so I'll publish it again:

Love

Nem xxx

*Here's Andrea, doing what she does best... being bilious and petulant.

Andrea plays tag

It really is no wonder police dismiss so many of Andrea's claims as vexatious is it?

Her knowledge of the laws of England, both criminal and civil, and legal procedure, appear sketchy in the extreme.

 Screenshots enlarge when clicked 

Andrea, police and the courts aren't there just to do your bidding. They do investigate claims, and in both criminal and civil law, those accused are entitled to make a defence.

Given how much you lie and exaggerate, it's really not hard to dismiss a great deal of your BS is it? And the lies and your abuse are well documented here on this blog and in other screenshots I have.

Joshua Bonehill-Paine however has a little bit of history of being hauled up in court, for various misdemeanours, as one who makes up shocking stories about people with no basis in fact and spreads them over the internet, for what reasons it's still not clear. I've touched on all this before on this blog.

He had others very willing to help spread his lies around, didn't he? He ended up in court over this, those who spread it around possibly had a lucky escape from the reach of the law?

Andrea of course has conveniently forgotten this and trolled Bonehill, linking to a hashtag, his Twitter and attempting to get her followers to abuse him. It's standard Andrea Twitter procedure. Not wise of course, unless you want his solicitor to cite such abuse in his defence next time he's in court?

http://www.westerngazette.co.uk/Joshua-Bonehill-Paine-vows-lessons-spared-jail/story-21013929-detail/story.html

Accompanied by his mother to court, magistrates were told how widespread "provocation" over a long period of time from a number of individuals had led to Mr Bonehill-Paine's actions.

Michaela Rose, defending, said the defendant accepted the information behind the article was wrong and he had made a "huge error" in sharing the information without checking its truthfulness or validity.

She claimed in the lead-up to the inaccurate article, Mr Bonehill-Paine had been subjected to "disturbing" messages from individuals who had taken a dislike to him - and the defendant believed the Globe pub landlord was part of this internet attack on him.

Two posts about this here:

http://nemesisrespondsto.blogspot.co.uk/2014/08/andrea-urban-fox-homophobia-bonehill.html

http://nemesisrespondsto.blogspot.co.uk/2014/08/andrea-urban-fox-still-baleful.html

And a news report:

http://www.morningadvertiser.co.uk/General-News/Leicester-pub-received-death-threats-after-false-report-of-soldier-ban

Bonehill is back in court again soon,  for his online antics. It remains to be seen what he pleads this time. He pleaded guilty last time. 

http://www.westerngazette.co.uk/Yeovil-man-Joshua-Bonehill-Paine-appears-court/story-22920773-detail/story.html

And of course Andrea sees this as another excuse to play victim, which she isn't.

Have you dear?  Has anyone ever accused you of being a paedophile? I certainly haven't. 

I did suggest this, and I stand by it as fair comment:

"My own view is that Andrea and Social Services need to meet.  Some psychiatric assessment of her deluded behaviour wouldn't come amiss."

Same Andrea who claimed on Twitter I am a pervert?  I have the screenshot of that too.   Her pal Vicky maliciously lied on Twitter I am a paedophile (yes I reported that to police, along with her threats to 'visit' me which Andrea thought fit to favourite?)

http://nemesisrespondsto.blogspot.co.uk/2014/09/travel-broadens-mind-happy-holidays.html

Andrea of course also maliciously lied I defend paedophilia on her blog (as for the manipulative lying low life who stops at nothing part... hmmmm! telling the truth about Andrea hurts does it?)

 I have written about that outright lie here:

http://nemesisrespondsto.blogspot.co.uk/2014/04/for-victoria-denise-lloyd-on-sex-abuse.html

And oh look, here's her pet troll account (how like Andrea it sounds, eh?) telling lies I used her son's photo on my blog, which Andrea was happy to believe as she's either gullible or willing to believe any old nonsense which suits her attention seeking? No I didn't. I for a very brief time (about an hour?)  inadvertently posted it on my Twitpics as she used it on her avatar  for an abusive Twitlonger about me. I removed as soon as I realised and reposted with the avatar blanked.  So no, she didn't take a screenie of it on my blog. Another lie. 

And I wrote about that here:

http://nemesisrespondsto.blogspot.co.uk/2013/11/rumours-are-carried-by-haters-spread-by.html

Of course it's fine when Andrea writes abusive blogs about me, encourages her pals to write abusive comments, then tags with my online name, terrorist, psycho etc?  That's somehow different?

Yes, this all appears very random. Terrorist? TERRORIST?

And her yawn making smears about Jewhate etc.

However, back to Andrea's recent queefing, on 12 September.

Thanks for the blog link Andrea, and yes, I used the term child abuse in the tags.

Yes I used it as the blog had a major part of it... child abuse.

Oh look, here's the blog.

http://nemesisrespondsto.blogspot.co.uk/2014/08/andrea-urban-fox-not-art-lover-faking.html

Which was in part about... child abuse, though no-one was accusing you of child abuse in it were they?

So jog on Andrea.

I'll use the tag child abuse and social services for this blog, as actually, they are mentioned in it. And that's the purpose of tags, yes?

Love

Nem 

xxx